//
you're reading...
Updates

Judge receives brief from sentencing expert: Defense responds

Judge Amul Thapar received a sentencing brief from sentencing law expert Douglas Berman on the eve of the Transform Now Sentencing hearings. Berman’s brief dealt with several questions raised in court at the first session of the sentencing which was disrupted by snow on January 28.

One argument put forward by the defense at the initial hearing was the use of the sabotage law against nonviolent protesters was outside the “heartland” of the law—meaning the law was intended for use against real saboteurs, not in cases like this. The prosecution argued, and the judge appeared to agree, that since the sabotage law was upgraded, it was rarely used against civilians, in fact, it had been used only three times, and all of them were in nuclear weapons protest cases. The logic was “if this is what it is being used for, it must be what it was meant for.” The judge, ignoring the fact that in two of those three cases judges had ruled for the defendants that the case was “outside the heartland,” concurred with the prosecution. Professor Berman disagrees.

The defense attorneys labored into the evening Monday, February 17, and filed their response to Bermans’ brief, noting Judge Thapar now not only has the discretion to provide some relief in sentencing, but has the opinion of an expert who suggests the Transform Now Plowshares defendants need not and should not be treated as though they were terrorists bent on actual sabotage.

You can read the Berman brief here:

Berman Friend Brief for Judge Thapar

And you can read the superb response by the defense team here:

Defendant’s Reponse to Court’s Request for Guidance 2-17-14

 

Sentencing on February 18 is expected to begin at noon with Michael Walli, followed by Greg Boertje-Obed at 2:00 and Megan Rice at 4:00pm.

 

About these ads

Discussion

One thought on “Judge receives brief from sentencing expert: Defense responds

  1. Although it is a matter of legal opinion, this is great news. The judge cannot blame it all on a badly written law (although it was and should be corrected in immediate course.) I wish I could be there for Megan. In my statement of support for my friend I mentioned Megan wanted me to help develop a conversion economy. I would be so honored if we could just settle down at NDE or Philly (where her order’s infirmary is but she likes warm climes better) and we could just execute that. It’s all in the judge’s hands, though: the one in the courtroom and the one upstairs. God bless and fare well today. This action has been the biggest noise. May it lead to the quiet of a pin drop heard throughout the world. All three are in my intentions today.

    Posted by MaryAnne Coyle | February 18, 2014, 1:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 169 other followers

%d bloggers like this: